Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 30 April 2014 12:00

Apple and Samsung sum up

Written by Nick Farrell



All about the money

The Apple versus Samsung case has wound up in one of the more silly patent trials of the century. Samsung has acknowledged that it might have used some of Apple’s patents, but Jobs Mob wanted an arm and a leg for them. Samsung lawyers said that Apple has vastly exaggerated the importance of its patented iPhone features and Apple said that Samsung should not have entered the smartphone market because it invented it.

The two tech leaders also sparred over how Google's work on the software used in Samsung phones affects Apple's patent claims. Apple and Samsung have been litigating around the world for three years. Jurors awarded the iPhone maker about $930 million after a 2012 trial in San Jose, California, but Apple failed to persuade Judge Lucy Koh to issue a permanent injunction against the sale of Samsung phones. The current case involves five Apple patents that were not in the 2012 trial and which cover iPhone features like slide to unlock and search technology. Apple is again seeking to ban sales of several Samsung phones, including the Galaxy S III, and collect $2 billion in damages.

Samsung also claims Apple violated two patents on streaming video. It is seeking to ban the iPhone 5, and asserted a $6 million damages claim. Samsung attorney William Price said some of Apple's patented technology in the case was never even incorporated into the iPhone. That undermines Cupertino, California-based Apple's claim for billions in damages. Another Samsung attorney, John Quinn, suggested that Apple devised its $2 billion request to inflate the value of the technology and confuse the jury.

But Apple attorney Harold McElhinny said Samsung's copying of Apple technology has greatly harmed the iPhone maker and turned the smartphone market into a two horse race instead of giving Apple total control, which was what nature intended. Samsung's “illegal strategy has been wildly successful," McElhinny claimed.

Apple attorney William Lee said Samsung's low damages request on its own patents was meant to cheapen intellectual property in general. The jury began deliberating yesterday and a verdict could be reached at any time.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments