Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 18 June 2014 10:14

Libraries can scan books without authors knowing

Written by Nick Farrell

EU ruling

The Advocate General of the European Union's Court of Justice has ruled that it is possible for libraries to scan books without seeking the author, or publisher’s permission. The case concerns a dispute between the Technical University of Darmstadt and a German publishing house, Eugen Ulmer.

The publishing house wanted to stop the university from digitising a book it holds in its library collection published by Eugen Ulmer and then providing it from electronic reading points. Students could then print the book or save it on a USB stick and/or take those reproductions out of the library.

Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen considers that the EU copyright directive does not prevent Member States from granting libraries the right to digitise the books from their collections, if their being made available to the public by dedicated terminals requires it. That may be the case where it is necessary to protect original works which, although still covered by copyright, are old, fragile or rare. That may also be the case where the work in question is consulted by a large number of students and its photocopying might result in disproportionate wear.

The Advocate General said that the directive permits not the digitisation of a collection in its entirety, but only the digitisation of individual works.

“It is particularly important not to opt to use dedicated terminals where the sole purpose of doing so is to avoid the purchase of a sufficient number of physical copies of the work,” he wrote.

Jääskinen said the directive does not allow the users of dedicated terminals to save the works made available to them on a USB stick.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments