Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 16 July 2014 10:52

Coppers open Pandora’s box

Written by Nick Farrell



Publishing company racket

The Department of Justice is investigating Big Content as details emerge of a possible cartel in operation with negotiations with Pandora. The Department of Justice has sent out CIDs (Civil Investigative Demand for Documents) to ASCAP, BMI, Sony/ATV Music Publishing and Universal Music Publishing Group.

The DoJ is investigating coordination among ASCAP, BMI, Sony/ATV Music Publishing and Universal Music Publishing Group and told ASCAP employees telling them to "preserve all documents.” Judge Denise Cote, said that Pandora has shown the Sony and UMPG licenses were the product of coordination between and among these major music publishers and ASCAP. She said that Sony and UMPG justified their withdrawal of new media rights from ASCAP by promising to create higher benchmarks for a Pandora-ASCAP license and then did just that.

Cote wrote that because Sony and UMPG were against Pandora, and they coordinated their activities to block them out and their very considerable market power that each of them holds individually was magnified. She did not think that it was necessary to look at if the actions were wrong. The direct licensing deals that UMPG and Sony cut with Pandora are poor anyway. But the DoJ seems a little more concerned about the legal aspect.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments