Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 17 July 2014 12:21

Apple agrees to pay up in settlement, conditionally

Written by Nick Farrell



We are still innocent

Fruity cargo cult Apple has agreed to write a check for millions for a crime it cannot admit it did, despite being found guilty by one Judge. Apple has agreed to pay $450 million to resolve US state and consumer charges that it conspired with five major publishers to fix e-book prices. Under the deal Apple would have to give $400 million back to consumers but this is conditional on the outcome of a pending appeal of a New York federal judge's ruling last year that Apple was liable for violating antitrust laws. 

The Tame Apple press is doing its best to put a positive spin on the story. Reuters said that a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York reversing the judge could, under the settlement, either reduce the amount Apple pays to $70 million, with $50 million for consumers, or eliminate payments altogether. That is if the Court of Appeals ignores any evidence presented to the first trial that showed that Apple’s Steve Jobs was the ringleader of the cartel. In July 2013, Cote found Apple liable for colluding with the publishers to impede e-book competitors such as Amazon.com after a non-jury trial.

Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen said it would be better to come to deal with Apple because it cannot predict the outcome of the appeal with certainty. Steve Berman, a lawyer for the consumer class at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, said if there is an "outright reversal, then we are done." But he said he believed the 2nd Circuit would uphold Cote's ruling. 

Apple in a statement denied that it had conspired to fix e-book prices and said it would continue pressing its case on appeal. Kristin Huguet, an Apple spokeswoman is insisting that Apple did nothing wrong and that a fair assessment of the facts will show it.

The $450 million figure, though high, is less than half what attorneys general in 33 states and territories and lawyers for a class of consumers were expected to seek in a damages trial. The publishers had to pay $166 million each for their involvement. The publishers include Lagardere SCA's Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Penguin Group (USA), CBS Corp's Simon & Schuster and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH's Macmillan.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments