Featured Articles

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC’s next generation 16nm process has reached an important milestone – 16nm FinFET Plus (16FF+) is now in risk production.

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 29 August 2014 09:48

Fudzilla’s case for a modular smartwatch standard

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic

LG-G-R

Opinion: Project Ara on your wrist, with a twist

Google generated a fair amount of buzz with Project Ara, a modular phone concept that might materialise next year.

However, the first generation of modular phones might not be all that it’s cracked up to be. Google (Motorola) and 3D Systems have spent months working to develop a number of manufacturing processes that will be employed in Project Ara. The endoskeleton is not easy to make as it has a lot of wiring. Modules pose similar challenges – 3D Systems will have to print quite a few conductive bits on each 3D-printed module and that is not as easy as it sounds.

The economics of Project Ara are another matter. While there is a market for modular phones, manufacturing costs are bound to end up somewhat higher than with traditional phones. This may change in the future, but not anytime soon.

What about modular smartwatches then?


But what if the industry took a similar approach to smartwatch design? The problem with Project Ara is that a number of crucial components have to be printed and installed separately. The Blocks modular smartwatch concept uses a different approach, but it still relies on proprietary components.

blocks-smartwatch

 

That is a problem with Blocks, a big problem. A modular watch should steer clear of proprietary standards. Watch makers have been selling standardised wrist straps for decades, why not use them instead? There are also a number of popular form factors, i.e. diameters – 34mm, 40mm, 42mm and so on.

A modular smartwatch does not need to reinvent the wristwatch, companies have been designing and manufacturing them for more than a century. A proper modular smartwatch should have just three components – a standardised strap, a couple of standardised housing form factors and of course the brains of the operation in the form of a compact smartwatch module that slides into the housing. The chipset, screen, battery, radios and all other electrical components in a single, standardised package.

Benefits of modular smartwatches


A major problem faced by today’s smartwatches is the price. People are used to upgrading their hardware every couple of years, but that is simply not the case with watches. Spending $300 or so every couple of years to upgrade a watch is not a tempting proposition.

A modular design would allow consumers to simply swap out an obsolete device and reuse the rest of the watch, thus offering much better value and making repairs easy. Furthermore an open standard could allow numerous companies to enter the space at different price tiers. The same form factor could be used for a playful $50 watch for teens and a $1,000 watch fit for a retirement gift. Brand loyalty is another issue – many people love their watch brand and they are essentially fanboys, if not snobs. Bottom line - they are big spenders and they will not trade in their Swiss timepieces for something made by Samsung or LG (no offense - we actually like most smartwatch designs, but we are geeks rather than fashionistas).

LG-G-R

Users could choose the features they need and the design of their preference, or mix a few components to come up with a unique watch that suits their needs. Geeks could go for the hottest hardware, while saving cash on a very cheap housing and strap. They could even design and print their own straps and housings, download or share designs, too. Conservative consumers with deep pockets could spend heaps on a branded strap and housing that will stand the test of time. Who would buy a gold smartwatch that will go obsolete or dead in a matter of years? But a gold smartwatch housing and strap that could accommodate any of a number of devices is another story.

We are not suggesting that Motorola, Samsung, LG and Apple got it wrong. They are doing what is best for their bottom line and they have some nice designs, but eventually the tech industry will have to coexist with traditional watchmakers and offer more choice. It will have to get established watch brands on board and it simply cannot do it with closed, proprietary designs.

It may take a few years, but modular is clearly the way to go.

Last modified on Sunday, 31 August 2014 08:36
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments