Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:27

US passes Anti-Spyware Bill

Written by
Image

Consumers not allowed to sue

 

The US House of Representatives has toughen penalties on spyware vendors and criminalise the act of installing potentially dangerous software on a user's machine.
However the Bill, which must also go through the Senate, removes the right of a consumer to sue if spyware is put on their machine.

The "Internet Spyware Prevention Act" (aka "I-SPY") provides clear disclosures of potential spyware but also contains many exemptions that could enable security vendors to install spyware on users' machines and monitor their activities.

It also means that those suffering under the cases similar to the  Sony rootkit scandal would have to rely on the government to act rather than suing.

Private lawsuits against Sony caused bad publicity for the company and forced it to settle the cases for millions of dollars.

More here.

Last modified on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:28

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments