Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Intel takes credit for three-way 4K gaming

Intel takes credit for three-way 4K gaming

All of a sudden Intel is talking about desktop gaming like there is no tomorrow and it is pushing it. The…

More...
Nvidia Shield Tablet 32GB 4G LTE out for pre orders

Nvidia Shield Tablet 32GB 4G LTE out for pre orders

Nvidia has finally revealed the shipping date of its Shield Tablet 32GB in 4G LTE flavour and in case you pre-order…

More...
Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple has finally unveiled its eagerly awaited smartwatch and surprisingly it has dropped the "i" from the brand, calling it simply…

More...
Skylake 14nm announced

Skylake 14nm announced

Kirk B. Skaugen, Senior Vice President General Manager, PC Client Group has showcased Skylake, Intel’s second generation 14nm architecture.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:27

US passes Anti-Spyware Bill

Written by
Image

Consumers not allowed to sue

 

The US House of Representatives has toughen penalties on spyware vendors and criminalise the act of installing potentially dangerous software on a user's machine.
However the Bill, which must also go through the Senate, removes the right of a consumer to sue if spyware is put on their machine.

The "Internet Spyware Prevention Act" (aka "I-SPY") provides clear disclosures of potential spyware but also contains many exemptions that could enable security vendors to install spyware on users' machines and monitor their activities.

It also means that those suffering under the cases similar to the  Sony rootkit scandal would have to rely on the government to act rather than suing.

Private lawsuits against Sony caused bad publicity for the company and forced it to settle the cases for millions of dollars.

More here.

Last modified on Thursday, 24 May 2007 12:28

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments