Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 07 September 2007 07:16

Judge rules against part of Patriot Act

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Broadened NSLs violate Constitution


 

In a key ruling on September 6th a U.S. District Court Judge has ruled unconstitutional the amended Patriot Act’s National Security Letter (NSL) provision that allows the FBI to send secret demands/NSLs to electronic communications service providers (ECSPs) demanding access to subscriber or transactional records, to obtain financial and credit documents and to obtain library records about subscribers.

NSLs were allowed prior to 2001 under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, but were supposed to be used only for investigations of terrorists or spies acting on behalf of a foreign power. After enactment of the Patriot Act in 2001, NSLs were given broader authority to request confidential customer information that was “relevant” to an investigation without requiring court approval, and NSLs also required a “gag” order on those who received the request for information.

The federal Judge ruled that the gag provisions were unconstitutional because no prior court approval was required before they were issued, violating the separation of powers provision where judicial matters are reserved solely for the judicial branch of the U.S. government; and that NSLs also violated First Amendment Constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and expression. The U.S. Justice Department did not indicate whether it would appeal the Judge’s ruling.

This ruling should help take the burden off Internet Service Providers, banks, lending institutions and librarians who have been put in the uncomfortable position of having to reveal confidential subscriber information about their customers, and also being unable to discuss it.  The ruling also requires there to be more justification and judicial involvement before such a request for customer confidential information can be required.

Last modified on Friday, 07 September 2007 09:42

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments