Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 07 September 2007 07:16

Judge rules against part of Patriot Act

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Broadened NSLs violate Constitution


 

In a key ruling on September 6th a U.S. District Court Judge has ruled unconstitutional the amended Patriot Act’s National Security Letter (NSL) provision that allows the FBI to send secret demands/NSLs to electronic communications service providers (ECSPs) demanding access to subscriber or transactional records, to obtain financial and credit documents and to obtain library records about subscribers.

NSLs were allowed prior to 2001 under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, but were supposed to be used only for investigations of terrorists or spies acting on behalf of a foreign power. After enactment of the Patriot Act in 2001, NSLs were given broader authority to request confidential customer information that was “relevant” to an investigation without requiring court approval, and NSLs also required a “gag” order on those who received the request for information.

The federal Judge ruled that the gag provisions were unconstitutional because no prior court approval was required before they were issued, violating the separation of powers provision where judicial matters are reserved solely for the judicial branch of the U.S. government; and that NSLs also violated First Amendment Constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and expression. The U.S. Justice Department did not indicate whether it would appeal the Judge’s ruling.

This ruling should help take the burden off Internet Service Providers, banks, lending institutions and librarians who have been put in the uncomfortable position of having to reveal confidential subscriber information about their customers, and also being unable to discuss it.  The ruling also requires there to be more justification and judicial involvement before such a request for customer confidential information can be required.

Last modified on Friday, 07 September 2007 09:42

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments