Featured Articles

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

IHS has told Recode that the Apple iPad Air 2 16GB Wifi costs only $275 to build -- not bad…

More...
LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

As Samsung is losing market share, another Korean company, which many had written off, is gaining.

More...
LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R is probably the best looking Android Wear device on the market and many have been waiting for…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 18 October 2007 10:35

2.8GHz Phenom FX is FX 80

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

King of the hill


AMD's fastest Phenom FX should be branded as Phenom FX80, and all future FX8x names should be reserved for Barcelona / Budapest-based quad core parts.

The Phenom FX is the show piece that should be able to compete with Intel's Penryn 3.0GHz, but the way it looks currently, Intel's quad core stands a better chance due to its clocking and SSE4. 3.0GHz versus 3GHz would be more interesting competition, but this won't happen until Q1; and at the same time Intel plans to introduce QX9770 with 3.2GHz clocking and FSB 1600. This one will make AMD work hard for its money once again.

Both Intel and AMD know that this is now where the money is, in 2.4 or slower parts. This is the sweet spot, and they will probably start a new price war in this particular segment.

Even if Intel wins the high end competition it won’t be safe in the 2.4 vs. 2.4GHz fight, and this one might be a tough one.


Last modified on Friday, 19 October 2007 06:46
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments