Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 18 October 2007 10:35

2.8GHz Phenom FX is FX 80

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

King of the hill


AMD's fastest Phenom FX should be branded as Phenom FX80, and all future FX8x names should be reserved for Barcelona / Budapest-based quad core parts.

The Phenom FX is the show piece that should be able to compete with Intel's Penryn 3.0GHz, but the way it looks currently, Intel's quad core stands a better chance due to its clocking and SSE4. 3.0GHz versus 3GHz would be more interesting competition, but this won't happen until Q1; and at the same time Intel plans to introduce QX9770 with 3.2GHz clocking and FSB 1600. This one will make AMD work hard for its money once again.

Both Intel and AMD know that this is now where the money is, in 2.4 or slower parts. This is the sweet spot, and they will probably start a new price war in this particular segment.

Even if Intel wins the high end competition it won’t be safe in the 2.4 vs. 2.4GHz fight, and this one might be a tough one.


Last modified on Friday, 19 October 2007 06:46
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments