Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 05 October 2007 13:05

RIAA wins hollow victory

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Woman ordered to pay $220,000 to 6 music companies


 

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has sued more than 26,000 Americans it claims have illegally downloaded music, and has used its stable of high priced lawyers to force settlements from most of the people it has sued.

Most of those sued have settled outside of court with the RIAA. A Minnesota woman who was charged with illegally encouraging the sharing of 1,700 songs has maintained that she was innocent of the charges and chose not to be forced into a settlement with the RIAA.  She made the RIAA take the case to court and for the first time present a file-sharing case before a jury. She lost, and was ordered to pay $9,250 each for 24 songs that the RIAA chose to focus on during the trial.

Jammie Thomas was accused of sharing music with Kazaa, the peer-to-peer file-sharing service.  Thomas still maintains that she has never owned a Kazaa account and that she did not know if someone else used her computer to illegally download music, but was unaware of it if that had occurred. The jury did not believe her, and ruled that Thomas alone was in charge of her computer and responsible for whatever use occurred; it was her computer, it was her house, regardless of who sat behind the keyboard at any given time.  The jury did not, however, find Thomas guilty of actually “sharing the files” or intentionally acting to do so. The damages were awarded because they found that she had made the files available by the use of her computer.  This finding could make it possible for Thomas to appeal the verdict because they didn’t find that she had intended to violate any music copyright laws.  However, she likely does not have the money to hire an expensive lawyer to pay for an in-depth appeal.

As for the victory itself, both sides indicated that this judgment will not reduce music file sharing or the use of music file sharing services.  This makes us wonder why the RIAA goes after small time individual users and then bankrupts them.  Wouldn’t it make more sense to arrive at a consensus between the RIAA and the American music consumer public as to what constitutes “reasonable use” of music?  And wouldn’t it also make a lot of sense to go after the people who are creating CDs of illegally downloaded music and distributing and selling hundreds and thousands of copies of them? These are the real violators; not college students and single mothers who share their computers with their friends and their kids.  And what about the users in countries outside the U.S. that do not even have copyright laws or recognize copyright violation as a crime? There is certainly “illegal use” of U.S. music in those countries.

We think the RIAA is barking up the wrong tree by threatening and suing individuals and that it should refocus its efforts on pursuing and prosecuting big violators and developing fair reasonable use standards.

Last modified on Friday, 05 October 2007 13:32

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments