Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:16

Quantum sues Riverbed Technologies

Written by David Stellmack

Image

More patent infringement claimed


 

In what seems to be an unending string of patent infringement lawsuits in the technology market space, U.S.-based Quantum Corporation has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Riverbed Technologies, Inc. 

Quantum, a global storage company specializing in backup, recovery and archive solutions that provides an integrated range of disk, tape and software solutions, brought the claim on the basis that Riverbed is selling products that employ a method of data de-duplication that is protected by a Quantum patent.  Riverbed Technologies, Inc., headquartered in San Francisco, California, is a leading provider of wide area data services (WDS).

Riverbed issued a statement that is has no knowledge or reason to believe that it is infringing any patents or interests of any third party.

Last modified on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:27

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments