Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 21 February 2011 13:53

ASRock E350M1 Brazos Review - Power-Consumption

Written by Eliot Kucharik

E350M1_board_front_small fusion 

Review: Intel Atom is dead




Gaming

As you can imagine, this CPU + GPU combination is not meant for gamers. So we won't bother you with meaningless benchmakrs in 800x600 with lowest settings. We benched Farcry 2 in 1280x720 at high and the results are comparable with a very fast slideshow. The fastest results were 13.8 average fps with the APU alone and 22 average fps with a HD6870, so a external graphics-card will not help at all. As you can imagine the CPU is far too underpowered for any playable framerates. If you are a fan of really old games such as Freelancer and it's tons of mods or others, you can play that easily, but any modern game, is just a waste of time.


Power-Consumption

With the 18W TDP you may expect a good efficiency ratio, but here AMD disappoints. With all the hype and PR we have expected much better, but even a quad-core can be more efficient. We have compared the AMD results with the ASRock 330ION-HT box, which of course comes with a 60W external power-supply, while inside the testrig we used a much overpowered 500W PSU which also gives quite bad efficiency with low consumption. We also went shopping to find a combination at around the same price and ended up with an Athlon II X2 250 and a ASRock 880GM/USB3 board. Both are around €20 more expensive then the E350M1 board with APU itself, but a smaller CPU would have only saved €5, so not worth the effort. Even the 880G board with the X2 250 CPU is more efficent, regardsless of using more energy overall.

E350M1_power_cb



E350M1_power

 

Benchmarks

Before we can draw any conclusions let's see about the overall benchmarks. All the acutal results will be shown after this page. First we have the costs of each platform. Sadly we could not compare the newer Atom D510 and D525 with ION2, but don't expect too much differences with the older Atom 330 silbling. All prices includes a 4GB Kit which is nowadays about €40.

We tested the E350M1 board with the default memory clock of 1067MHz and with C6 deep sleep enabled and disabled. Last week we got a new BIOS which included the 1333MHz memory support which is offically not supported by AMD but did improve the results more than expected.

E350M1_costs

 

Conclusion

Brazos Platform:

The results are not stunning or even great, AMD just did ok. While it's not really that much faster compared to Intel's Atom, AMD has one huge advantage - its graphics drivers are not broken. Use it with Windows XP, Windows 7 or Linux it will just work. Do the same with Intel and you can only go for Windows 7 and then the drivers will work only for the most basic functions but even old games may get texture-bugs. Combine a Atom with an ION will work too but it's much more expensive for the manufactures to get. Intel and nVidia could buy the marketshare, but it's seems unlikely they will do that in the lowest margin market anyways. On the other hand AMD has its foot in the door and with it's upcoming quad- and octacores it may become a player in the notebook market again.

In terms of desktops it does all the basic stuff you ask of a computer, it will play your HD content with most of the content besides 3D and if you're thinking for a PC for mum, that's a good way to go. If you casually want to play new games it's much better to go with an Athlon II X2 250 with any 880G board. Combine that with and any 6800 series or the upcoming GeForce 550 Ti card and it will do hugly better. For fifty bucks more you will even get a quad-core Athlon or Phenom which will make gaming even better.

In the future even µATX boards will emerge which is a nice idea, espeically if you have some addin-cards which shouldn't go to waste. But there is a problem called power supplies. With a consumption of about 43W there is no power-supply which will fit. All companies are crazy and going for more Watts than less. The smalles ATX PSUs rate at 250W if you are lucky otherwise you have to go for 300W or even more. Even a 80plus Gold like ours, will suffer efficency on the low load. The crazy designers also got their hands on ITX cases where you also can find 200W and 250W PSUs which is quite ridiculous.


ASRock E350M1:

We are not satisfied with the build quality. We don't like normal capacitors, we don't like push-pins and we especially don't like tiny noisy fans. You can adjust the fan-speed in the BIOS. At level 5 the fan will be still audible but not insanely loud. A bigger cooler with a 6cm would have fitted nicely and would have brought down the noiselevel considerable. I would have invested two bucks more in the BOM but sadly my name is not "Fatality". Besides that, the board did work fine, the 1333MHz memory support does increase the performance and with a price of €87,50 or $99 the board is affordable but not cheap considering the performance. We hope for a ASRock E350M1 Pro board whiich will fix all our complaints and add USB 3.0 support and we would gladly pay €5 more and mum would get a nice new PC.

Due to high demand of E-350 APUs from the netbook and notebook manufactures the retail market will go through some shortages.

 

(Page 5 of 6)
Last modified on Monday, 21 February 2011 20:11
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+8 #1 East17 2011-02-21 14:34
Atom is dead!

Thanks for the good news Eliot. :) Now let's put it into an unnamed grave... so that no intel marketing voodoo would bring it back.
 
 
+25 #2 guideX 2011-02-21 15:15
Does anyone understand this review? It begins by saying Atom (CPU) is DEAD, criticizes AsRock (OEM), complains you can't game on a 18W card, CONFUSING CONFUSING graphs which made no sense, claims that the Atom D525 could not be reviewed, Subsequently uses Atom D525 in a benchmark and ends with saying E350 is crap?

The hell

oh and im really serious about your graphs, nobody understands them.
 
 
-19 #3 East17 2011-02-21 15:23
Good review! Got my vote! Thanks!
 
 
-1 #4 123s 2011-02-21 15:34
I liked the review too. Just why testing FC2 on high and not mid/low, to make it somehow playable ?
 
 
+18 #5 bunker 2011-02-21 15:40
i dont get it. AMD did just OK..
have you not looked at the "cost per percentage"-graph.

Brazos offers between 30-20% more performance per dollar! how is that "just OK"


i mean seriously brazos is a sexy piece of silicon. its faster CPU-side, faster GPU-side, better compatibility, lower power consumption, lower price than atom (even with ion)


YOU MAKE THE DAMN GRAPHs YOURSELF, READ THEM. THEN MAKE CONCLUSIONS, dont just discart the graphs.

and troo find a better way to plot your figures it takes ages to see which color is which bar. and then still its unreadable
 
 
+8 #6 Psycho 2011-02-21 15:50
My miniitx box with this board, an old (7w idle) 3.5" harddrive and with a 75w external brick-psu consumes 20w idle and 30w load. (and peaks at 45w at startup because of hd spin up..). So the bad power figures here are really due to that big PSU, and far from comparable to the boxed ion system.

And btw, regarding the "useless" vga connector - my tv can only accept it's native 1366x768 by the vga input, so glad it's there..
 
 
+8 #7 TechHog 2011-02-21 16:17
Quoting guideX:
Does anyone understand this review? It begins by saying Atom (CPU) is DEAD, criticizes AsRock (OEM), complains you can't game on a 18W card, CONFUSING CONFUSING graphs which made no sense, claims that the Atom D525 could not be reviewed, Subsequently uses Atom D525 in a benchmark and ends with saying E350 is crap?

The hell

oh and im really serious about your graphs, nobody understands them.

And on top of all that, they used XP for the testing. This isn't 2006. Windows 7 runs fine on low-end hardware, and most systems using this board will use Windows 7. I'm probably overreacting, but I just have a hard time taking a tech review seriously when Windows XP is used in 2011.
 
 
+13 #8 MrScary 2011-02-21 16:25
This review is gonna be nominated to the razzies of the worst tecnical press review ever made :D, is super laughtable, a joke.

Like said guidex, is a total nonsense.

If you want to know the truth just go to anadtech or legitreviews, the made the best review about AMD Fusion, and is clearly a winner.

AMD FTW.
 
 
-4 #9 TechHog 2011-02-21 16:31
Quoting MrScary:
This review is gonna be nominated to the razzies of the worst tecnical press review ever made :D, is super laughtable, a joke.

Like said guidex, is a total nonsense.

If you want to know the truth just go to anadtech or legitreviews, the made the best review about AMD Fusion, and is clearly a winner.

AMD FTW.

MrScary said something we can agree with.

This is a bad sign.
 
 
-7 #10 Regenweald 2011-02-21 16:52
Atom is only dead if AMD can get products to market. They seem to be struggling with that currently. You can't beat a product if you don't have inventory to fill its place.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments