Featured Articles

Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple has finally unveiled its eagerly awaited smartwatch and surprisingly it has dropped the "i" from the brand, calling it simply…

More...
Skylake 14nm announced

Skylake 14nm announced

Kirk B. Skaugen, Senior Vice President General Manager, PC Client Group has showcased Skylake, Intel’s second generation 14nm architecture.

More...
Apple officially announces 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus

Apple officially announces 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus

The day has finally come and it appears that most rumors were actually spot on as Apple has now officially unveiled…

More...
CEO: Intel on target for 40m tablets

CEO: Intel on target for 40m tablets

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich just kicked off the IDF 2014 keynote and it started with a phone avatar, some Katy Perry…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 13 October 2011 09:37

HP rethinks selling PC dvision

Written by Nick Farell



Better off keeping it for now


Papers presented to the maker of expensive printer ink, HP suggest that spinning off or flogging the outfits PC devision is silly.

According to the Wall Street Journal, papers that have crossed HP's board and Meg Whitman's desk have indicated that it would insane to lose a a  division responsible for 29 per cent of HP's revenue last quarter. The analyses  suggests the company is better off keeping the division, which contributed $40.1 billion in revenue and $2 billion in operating profit in H-P's last full fiscal year.

Apparently it goes well beyond margins. Separating the PC division would significantly diminish H-P's buying power with component makers because HP would lose economies of scale. HP's supply chain would be gutted and it would lose profit margins on some products. All seems obvious, but apparently was not thought of by former CEO Leo Apotheker who was a software rather than a hardware sort of bloke. Supply chains and margins are usually a problem that other CEO's face, but he never did.

The question is why did HP push through with part of Apotheker's cunning plan to turn HP into a bigger SAP by buying British software company Autonomy? In short they just paid $10.2 billion for something they probably no longer need. Analysts are starting to think that HP's CEO's are never really the problem, but it is its board of directors, which are increasingly starting to look like a Frank Oz creation.

Word on the street is that some shareholders are starting to sharpen their scythes and it will be board members they want to to remove.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203499704576625434293946542.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEADTop

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments