Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 25 November 2011 10:39

Samsung Tab ban unjust

Written by Nick Farell



Appeals down under


Samsung is appealing an Aussie judge's decision to ban its Galaxy Tab 10.1 from sale saying that she “misunderstood and misapplied” basic requirements of the law.

The appeal in the patent infringement case is being heard by the full bench of Judges including Justice Dowsett, Justice Foster and Justice Yates. The three have not made a decision yet but appeared to support a number of Samsung's arguments that elements of her reasoning were “grossly unjust”.

Apple won a temporary injunction banning sales of Samsung's tablet in Australia until a final hearing could take place next year. Samsung's lawyer claimed Justice Bennett did not attempt to properly evaluate the strength of Apple's case for infringement or whether the patents in question were invalid. She decided Apple had a prima facie case for patent infringement without conducting the proper tests, he said.

A temporary ban of the product would render it dead for this market, as it would be overtaken by newer models. The Galaxy Tab 10.1 is “stopped dead in its tracks”, perhaps at a critical time in the development of this market, he told the court. One of the judges appeared to agree saying that if you have a fast moving product which if taken off the market, it "destroys the opportunities available to the newcomer and preserves the monopoly of the incumbent then you'd have to have a very close look at the strength of the case.”

Samsung would have agreed to an early final hearing in March next year but Apple's terms which included that Samsung be prevented from launching both the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and other tablet products in Australia until the final hearing were unreasonable. One of the judges appeared to agree with this and another was critical of Apple's claim that, had the Samsung tablet been allowed to launch, Apple would suffer huge harm. He sceptically asked Apple's lawyer whether “the whole of Apple's going to come tumbling down” if Samsung had been permitted to sell the tablet until the final hearing.

More here.


blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments