Featured Articles

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC’s next generation 16nm process has reached an important milestone – 16nm FinFET Plus (16FF+) is now in risk production.

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 16 December 2011 11:43

Stop Online Piracy law stalled in committee

Written by Nick Farell



But it is still going through


Despite criticism of the bill from the America’s leading internet engineers and companies, it looks like the Stop Online Piracy Act, which we like to call the Stop Online Privacy Act, will be voted on soon.

Yesterday the bill got stalled in the committee stage but lawmakers repeatedly rejected attempts to water-down the bill. Apparently most of them have already cashed their “re-election contributions” from the music and film industry lobby groups and must press ahead with it. The committee voted 22-12 to reject an amendment that would do away with the bill’s most controversial provision that lets the Attorney General order changes to core internet infrastructure in order to stop copyright infringement.

But there are signs that the internet-blacklisting legislation was moving too fast. Republican Dan Lungren wanted to know why this law was being fast tracked. Zoe Lofgren added that the measure went too far saying that w never tried to filter the telephone networks to block illegal content on the telephone network, yet that is precisely what this legislation would do relative to the internet.

The law grants private companies the ability to de-fund websites they allege to be trafficking in unauthorized copyright and trademark goods. It actually means that the court case that Verizon lost against YouTube would not have gone ahead. Verizon would have just taken YouTube's domain name. The latest version requires a judge’s signature to order ad networks and banks to stop doing business with a site “dedicated” to infringing activities, which might slow the silliness down a bit.

Last modified on Friday, 16 December 2011 11:53

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments