Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 16 December 2011 11:43

Stop Online Piracy law stalled in committee

Written by Nick Farell



But it is still going through


Despite criticism of the bill from the America’s leading internet engineers and companies, it looks like the Stop Online Piracy Act, which we like to call the Stop Online Privacy Act, will be voted on soon.

Yesterday the bill got stalled in the committee stage but lawmakers repeatedly rejected attempts to water-down the bill. Apparently most of them have already cashed their “re-election contributions” from the music and film industry lobby groups and must press ahead with it. The committee voted 22-12 to reject an amendment that would do away with the bill’s most controversial provision that lets the Attorney General order changes to core internet infrastructure in order to stop copyright infringement.

But there are signs that the internet-blacklisting legislation was moving too fast. Republican Dan Lungren wanted to know why this law was being fast tracked. Zoe Lofgren added that the measure went too far saying that w never tried to filter the telephone networks to block illegal content on the telephone network, yet that is precisely what this legislation would do relative to the internet.

The law grants private companies the ability to de-fund websites they allege to be trafficking in unauthorized copyright and trademark goods. It actually means that the court case that Verizon lost against YouTube would not have gone ahead. Verizon would have just taken YouTube's domain name. The latest version requires a judge’s signature to order ad networks and banks to stop doing business with a site “dedicated” to infringing activities, which might slow the silliness down a bit.

Last modified on Friday, 16 December 2011 11:53

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments