Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 13 June 2012 09:25

EVGA GTX 690 4GB reviewed - Conclusion

Written by Sanjin Rados

thumbrecommended08 75

Review: Reference design, but still a winner

 

Like the rest of Nvidia’s partners, EVGA first launched the reference GTX 690. Later on, Nvidia gave selected partners a green light to come up with non-reference coolers, so EVGA made a water-block for its GTX 690 Hydro Copper. Since Hydro Copper is still not available on the market, we got a GTX 690 based on the reference design.

That EVGA’s GTX 690 is based on the reference design is definitely not a downside this time around. Namely, Nvidia did a really good job and the GTX 690 came out better than many expected.

When compared to two GTX 680 cards in SLI, thermals and power consumption on GTX 690 are definitely better. The GTX 690’s cooler is quieter and power consumption is lower.

In the past we’ve had scenarios where dual-GPU cards ran slower than two single-GPU cards in SLI. However, GTX 690’s performance is breathing down GTX 680 SLI’s neck. GTX 690’s Base clock is 91MHz lower than the GTX 680’s (9% difference). Thanks to the superior thermals however, Boost clock is only 39MHz lower than the GTX 680’s (4% difference). 

GTX 690 is currently the fastest graphics card around and Nvidia decided to cash in. The card launched at $999, which pretty much broke all the previous price records. Nvidia justifies the price by saying that it didn’t skimp on quality of components, which enabled them to squeeze out the maximum from two GK104 chips on a single PCB.

EVGA GTX 690 graphics card goes for about €1000 in EU, which is about the price you’ll pay for two EVGA GTX 680 cards.

If you have the cash to buy two GTX 680 cards, you may want to consider getting a GTX 690. One thing is for certain, GTX 690 is the best high-end card we’ve had on our test, which makes our award a no-brainer, really.

 

 

fudz recommended ny

 

(Page 10 of 10)
Last modified on Wednesday, 04 July 2012 09:12
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments