Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 26 July 2012 12:12

Apple should not have to pay Samsung

Written by Nick Farrell



Court to hear interesting defence


Jobs's Mob had an interesting defence when it came to its US court case versus Samsung. In the case Apple claimed that while Samsung owed it billions for using its patents it did not owe Samsung money for using its patents.

Apple claimed Samsung wanted a higher patent royalty than Apple pays to other companies, at a rate the South Korean company has never sought from any other licensee. Samsung is demanding a 2.4 percent rate on the "entire selling price" of Apple's mobile products, Apple said in the court filing.

It said that Samsung's royalty demands were multiple times more than Apple has paid any other patentees for licenses to their declared-essential patent portfolios. Samsung said that its royalty demands were consistent with industry norms.  Our guess is that Apple is so used to bullying other companies to charge it less it thinks that what it thinks is normal is the going rate.

However when Apple looks at what it thinks Samsung owes it for its patents the figure comes to most of the cost of making Samsung's gear. Samsung pointed out that Apple never made a counter offer to its original request.  It just refused to pay at all.
So far Apple has not paid Samsung a dime for Apple's use of Samsung's standards-essential technology.



Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments