Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 26 December 2012 13:35

Qualcomm ravaged SoC market in 2012

Written by Fudzilla staff

Best of 2012: It’s all about custom cores

We saw a lot of progress in the ARM world this year and 2013 promises to be even more eventful, with new A15 parts coming on line as we speak.

Still, there can be only one clear winner and 2012 goes to Qualcomm, or its Krait chips to be more precise. The custom core MSM8260 and APQ8064 made short work of vanilla A9 cores and in some respects they are still competitive in the A15 world. Impressive to say the least, and let’s not forget on board LTE support for our US readers.

Apple’s A6 easily ranks second and if it weren’t a proprietary chip found only in Apple gear, it would share the top spot with Krait chips. Once again we are dealing with a custom A9 core, capable of holding its own against some A9-based quads. The A6X is equally impressive, but so far it’s only limited to the iPad 4.

So, two custom cores are in the lead, but Samsung and Nvidia managed to generate quite a bit of noise with run of the mill A9 quad-cores. Samsung’s Exynos 4412 is somewhat faster than the venerable Tegra 3, but then again you can only get it in a handful of phones, while Tegra 3 powers quite a few interesting tablets, including the Nexus 7, Surface RT and Asus Transformer TF700. We think both deserve the bronze.

Samsung’s Exynos 5250, the world’s first A15 SoC, is also worth mentioning, but it arrived a bit too late to make its presence felt in 2012.

So what was the worst ARM SoC of the year? This is a rather tricky question, and frankly speaking we can’t think of one. Sure, there are some horrible SoCs made by smaller outfits, but practically none of them filtered through to the mainstream market and they’re just not worth talking about. Unless you are getting a Chinese white box tablet, chances are you will end up with a decent SoC.

Mobile SoC performance is increasing at a mind boggling rate, reminding us of the good old days, i.e. the peak of the Intel – AMD x86 rivalry. Just a few weeks from now we will see a few brand new A15-based cores and let’s not write Intel off just yet. Chipzilla is gearing up to take on the ARM alliance in 2013 and 2014, but is it too little too late?

Last modified on Thursday, 27 December 2012 23:25
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments