Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 25 January 2013 10:36

Germans say Internet crucial to life

Written by Nick Farrell



Federal court rules loss needs to be compensated


A German court has ruled that the Internet is an important commodity, and people should be compensated for the loss of it.

The German Federal Court of Justice has ruled that because having an internet connection is so significant for a large part of the German population, a customer whose service provider failed to provide connectivity between December 2008 and February 2009 is entitled to compensation. It is the first time a court ruled that an Internet connection is as important a commodity as having a phone.

The plaintiff was disconnected by mistake and demanded that the unnamed telecommunications company pay for costs that incurred in switching to a new provider. He wanted €50 per day for the period his was unable to use his DSL, fax over IP and VoIP services, according to the court. The Federal Court, however, awarded compensation only for loss of the internet connection. Compensation for the loss of a fax connection was denied.

This was because a fax only enables the user to send text and images faster than conventional mail and the technology is increasingly becoming irrelevant. While a phone connection is an important commodity, the plaintiff was also denied compensation for loss of his VoIP phone line since he owned a mobile phone.

Last modified on Sunday, 27 January 2013 09:54

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments