Featured Articles

Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple has finally unveiled its eagerly awaited smartwatch and surprisingly it has dropped the "i" from the brand, calling it simply…

More...
Skylake 14nm announced

Skylake 14nm announced

Kirk B. Skaugen, Senior Vice President General Manager, PC Client Group has showcased Skylake, Intel’s second generation 14nm architecture.

More...
Apple officially announces 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus

Apple officially announces 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus

The day has finally come and it appears that most rumors were actually spot on as Apple has now officially unveiled…

More...
CEO: Intel on target for 40m tablets

CEO: Intel on target for 40m tablets

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich just kicked off the IDF 2014 keynote and it started with a phone avatar, some Katy Perry…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 03 June 2013 09:33

Apple in court for anti-trust

Written by Nick Farrell



DoJ says it has “direct evidence”

Jobs’ Mob will go to trial over anti-trust allegations that it ran a pricing cartel with the big publishers over e-books. Apple insists it is innocent, despite the fact that its former CEO and messiah, Steve Jobs admitted it in his biography.

David Balto, a former policy director for the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has said that the case is important because it will have a knock on effect on the rest of e-commerce. Apple is going to trial alone after the five publishers, and potential Apple allies, agreed to eliminate prohibitions on wholesale discounts and to pay a collective $164 million to benefit consumers. As such it is going to be jolly hard for Apple to argue that it was entirely free of guilt. What is strange is that the DoJ is not even after dosh, but wants an order blocking Apple from engaging in similar conduct.

If Apple is found liable, it could still face damages in a separate trial by the state attorneys general and consumers pursuing class actions. Already a comment by the presiding judge Denise Cote at the final hearing before the trial, Apple may face an uphill battle. She has said that the government will be able to show at trial direct evidence that Apple knowingly participated in and facilitated a conspiracy to raise prices of e-books.

John Lopatka, a law professor at Pennsylvania State University told Reuters Apple may be calculating that future damages claims by states and class actions make it worth going to trial. The cunning plan might be that Apple may lose at the trial level, but we may well convince an appellate court the trial judge mischaracterised the evidence.

More here.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments