Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 03 June 2013 09:33

Apple in court for anti-trust

Written by Nick Farrell



DoJ says it has “direct evidence”

Jobs’ Mob will go to trial over anti-trust allegations that it ran a pricing cartel with the big publishers over e-books. Apple insists it is innocent, despite the fact that its former CEO and messiah, Steve Jobs admitted it in his biography.

David Balto, a former policy director for the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has said that the case is important because it will have a knock on effect on the rest of e-commerce. Apple is going to trial alone after the five publishers, and potential Apple allies, agreed to eliminate prohibitions on wholesale discounts and to pay a collective $164 million to benefit consumers. As such it is going to be jolly hard for Apple to argue that it was entirely free of guilt. What is strange is that the DoJ is not even after dosh, but wants an order blocking Apple from engaging in similar conduct.

If Apple is found liable, it could still face damages in a separate trial by the state attorneys general and consumers pursuing class actions. Already a comment by the presiding judge Denise Cote at the final hearing before the trial, Apple may face an uphill battle. She has said that the government will be able to show at trial direct evidence that Apple knowingly participated in and facilitated a conspiracy to raise prices of e-books.

John Lopatka, a law professor at Pennsylvania State University told Reuters Apple may be calculating that future damages claims by states and class actions make it worth going to trial. The cunning plan might be that Apple may lose at the trial level, but we may well convince an appellate court the trial judge mischaracterised the evidence.

More here.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments