Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Sunday, 15 September 2013 11:24

Intel Chief Engineer talks Haswell’s 5-year journey

Written by Fuad Abazovic

How Intel came to care about low power

As we all know, some of the key fundamentals of CPU design take years to develop. Intel’s new generation every second year is small miracle in itself, as the development cycles is a bit longer. Haswell that launched this June at 22nm was actually not drafted to be such an efficient mobile processor because work on Haswell started years ago.

Rani N. Borkar, Vice President General Manager, Intel Architecture Development Group mention that five years ago, when her group started the long journey of developing Haswell, the original plan was not to make it a great mobile chip. She was the leading development of Haswell and had big involvement in Bay Trail development, making her very qualified to explain the journey to 22nm products.

Five years ago Intel cared mostly about the performance of the core, not so much about power efficiency, but this was about to change. Intel recognized the need to make lower TDP on chips and necessity to make the transition in what Rani calls changing Intel’s mobile culture.

This is when the journey started. Four generations of Intel’s Core architecture got better and better, eventually culminating in Haswell as the crown jewel in Intel’s current portfolio. Intel went back to the drawing boards and made necessary optimisations and changes in order to lower TDP, create great performance that won’t kill battery life making Haswell one of the most scalable cores in the company’s history.

Haswell works scales from 84W TDP in a higher end desktop or business machines down to 17W in ultrabooks and even 4.5W in tablets that should be shortly announced. This is not all as with Broadwell transistors go almost 30 percent smaller and Intel showcased at the IDF keynote that we can see an additional 30 saving compared to Haswell. The future of Intel is high performance with turbo support, but the emphasis has clearly shifted to scalable designs, so it can tweak a CPU in order to save as much power as possible, while at the same time using the same core for high-end desktops. This is the current path.

This is also leading to another interesting trend – a lot more overlap. Haswell is going down to 4.5W, while some new Atoms will end up with Celeron and Pentium branding. To some extent the same trend applies to AMD, as some of its Jaguar-based products will replace some entry level Richland chips.

blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments