Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 15 November 2013 09:20

Intel forced AMD to adopt SDP metric

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic



If you can’t beat them, join them

Earlier this week AMD added Beema and Mullins to its mobile roadmap and the decision to ditch the good old TDP metric for Mullins parts raised quite a few eyebrows.

SDP, or Scenario Design Power was used in lieu of TDP. Of course, SDP is not AMD’s invention. It was introduced by Intel a couple of years ago and used for its ultra low power parts, miraculously shaving off a few watts with the strike of a pen. Intel adopted the new metric to make its chips seem a tad more competitive compared with ARM SoCs.

Now AMD is doing the same in an effort to level the playing field and make Mullins look more competitive compared with Intel chips.

“We had to adapt to using an SDP measure for Mullins so our power did not appear dramatically higher than Intel’s low-power SDP figures,” AMD told us.

AMD pointed out that it's not hiding the TDP of Mullins, it is just playing by the rules set by the competition, as it cannot afford to be perceived as less efficient simply because Intel refuses to use TDP. Unlike Intel, AMD will use both numbers for upcoming ultra-low power parts.

blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments