Featured Articles

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC’s next generation 16nm process has reached an important milestone – 16nm FinFET Plus (16FF+) is now in risk production.

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 15 November 2013 09:20

Intel forced AMD to adopt SDP metric

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic



If you can’t beat them, join them

Earlier this week AMD added Beema and Mullins to its mobile roadmap and the decision to ditch the good old TDP metric for Mullins parts raised quite a few eyebrows.

SDP, or Scenario Design Power was used in lieu of TDP. Of course, SDP is not AMD’s invention. It was introduced by Intel a couple of years ago and used for its ultra low power parts, miraculously shaving off a few watts with the strike of a pen. Intel adopted the new metric to make its chips seem a tad more competitive compared with ARM SoCs.

Now AMD is doing the same in an effort to level the playing field and make Mullins look more competitive compared with Intel chips.

“We had to adapt to using an SDP measure for Mullins so our power did not appear dramatically higher than Intel’s low-power SDP figures,” AMD told us.

AMD pointed out that it's not hiding the TDP of Mullins, it is just playing by the rules set by the competition, as it cannot afford to be perceived as less efficient simply because Intel refuses to use TDP. Unlike Intel, AMD will use both numbers for upcoming ultra-low power parts.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments