Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 15 November 2013 09:20

Intel forced AMD to adopt SDP metric

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic



If you can’t beat them, join them

Earlier this week AMD added Beema and Mullins to its mobile roadmap and the decision to ditch the good old TDP metric for Mullins parts raised quite a few eyebrows.

SDP, or Scenario Design Power was used in lieu of TDP. Of course, SDP is not AMD’s invention. It was introduced by Intel a couple of years ago and used for its ultra low power parts, miraculously shaving off a few watts with the strike of a pen. Intel adopted the new metric to make its chips seem a tad more competitive compared with ARM SoCs.

Now AMD is doing the same in an effort to level the playing field and make Mullins look more competitive compared with Intel chips.

“We had to adapt to using an SDP measure for Mullins so our power did not appear dramatically higher than Intel’s low-power SDP figures,” AMD told us.

AMD pointed out that it's not hiding the TDP of Mullins, it is just playing by the rules set by the competition, as it cannot afford to be perceived as less efficient simply because Intel refuses to use TDP. Unlike Intel, AMD will use both numbers for upcoming ultra-low power parts.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments