Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 06 February 2014 12:29

Benchmarks show FirePro cleaning Nvidia’s clock

Written by Nick Farrell



Cheaper and better

Update: The V4900 did not beat the K6000, but rather the entry-level K600. We apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused.

New
benchmarks are starting to show that Sapphire’s AMD’s FirePro cards are not only much more affordable to similar offerings from Nvidia, they are also faster.

Normally benchmark suites like 3DMark are used to gauge performance of standard video cards, they are a chocolate teapot when it comes to assessing professional video cards, like the AMD FirePro series and Nvidia’s Quadro. However, a benchmarking utility endorsed by both AMD and Nvidia called SPECviewperf is up to the task and it starting to show clear differences between the two. SPECviewperf includes a host of graphics applications that test all major facets of a card. These tests emulate the real world usage of a card, and feature viewsets for widely used animation suites like CATIA, CREO, MAYA, SNX and Solidworks.

Ihe test features eight categories over which different cards from both AMD’s FirePro and Nvidia’s Quadro series were tested. In the entry-level segment, Sapphire’s AMD FirePro V3900 was pitted against an Nvidia Quadro 410. Both cards are available for under $200, but when it comes down to the performance, the FirePro V3900 wins by a huge margin, and achieved 3.6 times better performance in the Maya test.

It can be seen with the FirePro V4900 and the Quadro K600, with the V4900 beating the K600 in all eight tests conclusively. It is the same with the mid-range segment. The FirePro W5000 edging out the Quadro K2000 in all tests and the W5000 was 2.3 times better than the K2000 in the SNX 02 viewset. When you get to the mid- to high-end segment, the difference between the FirePro W7000 and the Quadro K4000 is not as noticeable, but the W7000 is slightly better in seven of eight tests. 

Unless AMD is designing the cards to detect the test and alter performance, which seems unlikely, then Nvidia is clearly lagging behind.

Last modified on Friday, 07 February 2014 13:44
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments