Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 06 February 2014 12:29

Benchmarks show FirePro cleaning Nvidia’s clock

Written by Nick Farrell



Cheaper and better

Update: The V4900 did not beat the K6000, but rather the entry-level K600. We apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused.

New
benchmarks are starting to show that Sapphire’s AMD’s FirePro cards are not only much more affordable to similar offerings from Nvidia, they are also faster.

Normally benchmark suites like 3DMark are used to gauge performance of standard video cards, they are a chocolate teapot when it comes to assessing professional video cards, like the AMD FirePro series and Nvidia’s Quadro. However, a benchmarking utility endorsed by both AMD and Nvidia called SPECviewperf is up to the task and it starting to show clear differences between the two. SPECviewperf includes a host of graphics applications that test all major facets of a card. These tests emulate the real world usage of a card, and feature viewsets for widely used animation suites like CATIA, CREO, MAYA, SNX and Solidworks.

Ihe test features eight categories over which different cards from both AMD’s FirePro and Nvidia’s Quadro series were tested. In the entry-level segment, Sapphire’s AMD FirePro V3900 was pitted against an Nvidia Quadro 410. Both cards are available for under $200, but when it comes down to the performance, the FirePro V3900 wins by a huge margin, and achieved 3.6 times better performance in the Maya test.

It can be seen with the FirePro V4900 and the Quadro K600, with the V4900 beating the K600 in all eight tests conclusively. It is the same with the mid-range segment. The FirePro W5000 edging out the Quadro K2000 in all tests and the W5000 was 2.3 times better than the K2000 in the SNX 02 viewset. When you get to the mid- to high-end segment, the difference between the FirePro W7000 and the Quadro K4000 is not as noticeable, but the W7000 is slightly better in seven of eight tests. 

Unless AMD is designing the cards to detect the test and alter performance, which seems unlikely, then Nvidia is clearly lagging behind.

Last modified on Friday, 07 February 2014 13:44
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments