Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 11 April 2014 13:46

Sharing details of hacks not anti-trust violation

Written by Nick Farrell



US has to reassure businesses

The US government is on a campaign to reassure corporates that they will not face anti-trust penalties if they share information on hacks. The new push comes as many top retailers and other companies have suffered major data breaches.

James Cole, the number two official at the U.S. Justice Department, told reporters in a briefing on new guidance the agency issued along with the Federal Trade Commission that if companies do not discuss competitive information such as pricing or output when sharing cybersecurity details, they will not conflict with antitrust laws. It is not clear how sharing data on your systems being attack could represent any anti-trust action, but apparently, some companies were concerned.

“This is an antitrust no-brainer: Companies who engage in properly designed cyberthreat information sharing will not run afoul of the antitrust laws,” said Bill Baer, the assistant attorney general in charge of the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. “This means that as long as companies don’t discuss competitive information such as pricing and output when sharing cybersecurity information, they’re OK.”

Michael Daniel, cybersecurity coordinator at the U.S. White House wrote in his blog that in today’s networked world, a cyberthreat to one is really a cyberthreat to all. “This is why steps such as today’s announcement that can encourage more information sharing are key to building up our collective cybersecurity,” he added.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments