Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 03 August 2007 10:49

Alltel worried about Qualcomm chip ban

Written by

Image

Might have to change technology

 

Rural mobile service Alltel is looking for new technology or licensing pacts to get around a government ban on the US sale of Qualcomm chips.

The US International Trade Commission banned the sale of high-speed wireless phones using Qualcomm chips last month. It allowed phones already being imported on that date, but these are fast running out.

Alltel says it could be hurt by the ban as they depend largely on phones with Qualcomm chips their high-speed wireless services.

Verizon Wireless and Vodafone last month agreed to pay license fees to Broadcom to avoid the ITC ban.

A spokesman for Alltel said the company may have to come up with alternative technology or license pacts like the Verizon/Broadcom deal.

More here.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments