Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 15 January 2013 11:02

Instagram loses customers

Written by Nick Farrell



Messing around with Terms and Conditions sunk it


It is starting to look like Instagram could suffer seriously from its control freak antics. While the company quickly realised that its plans to nick the photographs of users without paying for them simply by changing the terms and conditions would not really fly, it seems that customers see the brand as contaminated.

According to data provided by app traffic company AppStats, Instagram has lost more than half of all its active users in the month since proposing to change its original Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. In mid-December, Instagram boasted about 16.3 million daily active users; as of January 14, Instagram only has about 7.6 million daily users.

The figures show that the photo-sharing app continues to gain monthly active users so all is not lost, but it does indicate how careful companies have to be about their customers perceptions. In this case it was a listing in the new terms and conditions which said that users granted the company a non-exclusive, fully paid and royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to use the content that you post on or through the service.

But there was no guarantees that that the person’s snaps could not be used on Facebook advertising. Instagram quickly tried to plug the leak when users complained about the new approach by reverting to its original privacy policy. The company was badly hit in the UK, where fears of the loss of digital privacy are greater.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments