Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 08 January 2014 12:34

Nvidia not impressed by AMD free sync demo

Written by Peter Scott



Handbag fight

AMD demonstrated an interesting sync solution at its pre-CES event, claiming that it will be simpler and cheaper to implement than Nvidia’s G-Sync. AMD’s free sync basically uses existing hardware, unlike G-Sync which relies on proprietary modules.
Free sync was demonstrated on a couple of cheap laptops and those who had a chance to see it in action say it works just fine. However, Nvidia begs to differ.

Nvidia’s Tom Petersen told the Tech Report that the two technologies aren’t really comparable. Peterson pointed out that the demonstration worked on laptops because they have a more direct interface between the GPU and the screen. Laptops use LVDS or eDP interfaces, while desktops use DisplayPort and HDMI. The latter feature a scaler ASIC and they are not direct interfaces. Therefore Petersen insists AMD’s free sync is impossible to implement in desktops.

Nvidia’s approach was more elaborate, as G-Sync replaces the scaler ASIC with a proprietary Nvidia design. Run of the mill scaler ASICs do not support variable refresh rates, hence they cannot be used to eliminate stuttering or frame tearing.

However, although AMD’s free sync tech isn’t coming to desktops, it might prove useful in gaming laptops. Since it does not require any specialized hardware and it is compatible with the last three generation of AMD GPUs, it might be possible to add support to existing models with a firmware update.

Nvidia does not wish to open up G-Sync and allow its use with AMD graphics cards and AMD does not appear to be working on a similar solution of its own.

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments