Published in Graphics

Ryzen 9000X3D CPU double-digit multi-core performance uplift

by on07 October 2024


Leaker claims

Tom’s Hardware has noticed a leak from Codecommando which claims to have the inside trouser measurement of  AMD’s Ryzen 9000X3D processors.

The individual had previously leaked AMD’s Ryzen 9000 slides, were legitimate, so his information is good so far.

The leaker shared the Cinebench R23 results for the 8-core and 16-core Ryzen 9000X3D parts, corresponding to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D, respectively.

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D reportedly delivered a single-core score of around 2,145 points and a multi-core score of 23,315. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D purportedly scored 2,245 points in single-core tests and 42,375 in multi-core tests.

The Ryzen 9000X3D’s single-core performance is relatively close to that of its vanilla counterparts. However, the multi-core performance showed a significant difference. The Ryzen 9000X3D chips delivered 13 per cent to 32 per cent higher multi-core performance.

Cinebench R23 Benchmark

Single-Core Score

Multi-Core Score

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

≈2,245

≈42,375

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

2,279

41,929

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

2,233

32,359

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

2,014

26,847

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

≈2,145

≈23,315

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

2,219

20,608

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

1,812

18,003

The more powerful Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D are rumoured for an early 2025 release. The alleged reason for the delayed launch was that AMD is reportedly working on adding new features to the AMD 9000X3D parts.

AMD’s forthcoming processors, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X3D, are now expected to be released in early 2025. Sources indicate that the delay is attributed to AMD’s efforts to integrate new and advanced features into the 9000X3D series, promising substantial improvements in performance and functionality. This strategic postponement underscores AMD’s commitment to innovation and excellence in the competitive processor market.

 

Last modified on 07 October 2024
Rate this item
(2 votes)

Read more about: