Published in Reviews

PoV/TGT GTX 680 review, Air Cooling vs. Water Cooling

by on23 August 2012



Despite the GTX 680 4GB Beast’s watercooling, our overclocking didn’t yield significantly better results than those we scored with the air cooled GTX 680 4GB Ultra Charged. Naturally, watercooling alone is no guarantee for success, because the GPU requires more power for extreme clocks. Both cards managed to hit Base GPU clock of beyond 12010MHz, as the GPUZ shot below shows.

It appears Nvidia’s Boost technology runs better on the water cooled card. If you look at the GPUZ shot, you’ll see that the difference between Base and Boost clocks is 65MHz on the UC and 92MHz on the Beast.

gpuz oc
GTX 680 4GB Ultra Charged

gpuz card 2 oc
GTX 680 4GB Beast

Last modified on 23 August 2012
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Read more about: