The allegations about Google’s Play Store stem from an investigation involving nearly every US state that began in September 2019 and has already resulted in three other lawsuits against the company.
The cases threaten to force significant changes to how it generates billions of dollars in revenue across its businesses, including advertising, in-app purchases and smart home gadgets.
Google said the litigation was about boosting a handful of major app developers that want preferential treatment rather than about helping small businesses or consumers. It maintains that, unlike Apple, Android supports competitors to the Play Store.
“Android and Google Play provide openness and choice that other platforms simply don’t”, the company said in a blog post.
The states, led by Utah, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee, argue that Google has generated “enormous profit margins” from the Play Store by engaging in illegal tactics to preserve monopolies in selling Android apps and in-app goods.
According to the lawsuit, Google Play accounts for 90 percent of Android apps downloaded in the United States.
“Google leverages its monopoly power with Android to unlawfully maintain its monopoly in the Android app distribution market”, the lawsuit stated.
The states pointed to agreements already targeted in other lawsuits such as those Google has with mobile carriers and smartphone makers to promote its services.
But they added fresh claims after newly reviewing internal company documents. The states alleged that Google bought off developers so they would not support competing app stores. It intended to pay Samsung with numerous secret projects whose rival app store posed the most significant threat, to stop competing.
The plaintiffs, including California and the District of Columbia, also say Google has unlawfully mandated that some apps use the company’s payment tools and give Google as much as 30 percent of digital goods sales.The “extravagant commission”, compared with the three percent other marketplaces charge, has forced app makers to raise prices and consumers to spend more, the states said.
“Google Play is not fair play”, Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes said in a statement. “It must stop using its monopolistic power and hyper-dominant market position to unlawfully leverage billions of added dollars from smaller companies, competitors and consumers beyond what should be paid.”
The states want the consumers to get their money back. They also called for civil penalties and a court-imposed monitor to ensure Google eases the process for consumers, app developers and smartphone makers to use or promote alternatives to the Play Store and the official payment system for 20 years. In addition, the states seek to stop Google’s payments to Samsung and developers.
While the Tame Apple Press is celebrating the move, which, if successful, will make Jobs' Mob the King of the App stores, they failed to notice that the states say that they are investigating similar action against Apple over its App Store.
The filing drew praise from Meghan DiMuzio, executive director for the Coalition for App Fairness, which represents companies including Match Group and Spotify Technology SA (SPOT.N) that oppose some of the Play Store rules.
